@conference {Vidacs:Maltesque:2018:Coevo,
	title = {Co-evolution Analysis of Production and Test Code by Learning Association Rules of Changes},
	booktitle = {2018 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (MaLTeSQuE 2018)},
	year = {2018},
	note = {accepted},
	month = {March},
	pages = {1-7},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	author = {L{\'a}szl{\'o} Vid{\'a}cs and Martin Pinzger}
}
@conference {TVF15,
	title = {Comparison of Static Analysis Tools for Quality Measurement of {RPG} Programs},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA 2015)},
	series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)},
	volume = {9159},
	year = {2015},
	month = {jun},
	pages = {177{\textendash}192},
	publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
	organization = {Springer-Verlag},
	address = {Banff, Alberta, Canada},
	abstract = {The RPG programming language is a popular language employed widely in IBM i mainframes nowadays. Legacy mainframe systems that evolved and survived the past decades usually data intensive and even business critical applications. Recent, state of the art quality assurance tools are mostly focused on popular languages like Java, C++ or Python. In this work we compare two source code based quality management tools for the RPG language. The study is focused on the data obtained using static analysis, which is then aggregated to higher level quality attributes. SourceMeter is a command line tool-chain capable to measure various source attributes like metrics and coding rule violations. SonarQube is a quality management platform with RPG language support. To facilitate the objective comparison, we used the SourceMeter for RPG plugin for SonarQube, which seamlessly integrates into the framework extending its capabilities. The evaluation is built on analysis success and depth, source code metrics, coding rules and code duplications. We found that SourceMeter is more advanced in analysis depth, product metrics and finding duplications, while their performance of coding rules and analysis success is rather balanced. Since both tools were presented recently on the market of quality assurance tools, we expect additional releases in the future with more mature analyzers.},
	keywords = {Coding rules, IBM RPG, metrics, software quality, SonarQube, SourceMeter, Static Analysis},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-21413-9_13},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007\%2F978-3-319-21413-9_13},
	author = {T{\'o}th, Zolt{\'a}n and L{\'a}szl{\'o} Vid{\'a}cs and Rudolf Ferenc}
}
@conference {Nagy2011SQ,
	title = {Complexity Measures in {4GL} Environment},
	booktitle = {Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
	series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
	volume = {6786},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {293-309},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin / Heidelberg},
	organization = {Springer Berlin / Heidelberg},
	author = {Csaba Nagy and L{\'a}szl{\'o} Vid{\'a}cs and Rudolf Ferenc and Tibor Gyim{\'o}thy and Kocsis, F. and I. Kov{\'a}cs}
}
@conference {TFV10,
	title = {Complex Event Processing Synergies with Predictive Analytics},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems (DEBS{\textquoteright}10), Posters Session},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {95-96},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	author = {T{\'o}th, G. and F{\"u}l{\"o}p, L.J. and L{\'a}szl{\'o} Vid{\'a}cs and {\'A}rp{\'a}d Besz{\'e}des and Demeter, H. and Farkas, L. and Tibor Gyim{\'o}thy}
}
@article {VBG09,
	title = {Combining preprocessor slicing with {C}/{C++} language slicing},
	journal = {Science of Computer Programming},
	volume = {74},
	number = {7},
	year = {2009},
	note = {Special Issue on Program Comprehension (ICPC 2008)},
	pages = {399-413},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	keywords = {relate:quality},
	author = {L{\'a}szl{\'o} Vid{\'a}cs and {\'A}rp{\'a}d Besz{\'e}des and Tibor Gyim{\'o}thy}
}
@conference {VJB08,
	title = {Combining Preprocessor Slicing with {C}/{C++} Language Slicing},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC{\textquoteright}08)},
	year = {2008},
	month = {jun},
	pages = {163-171},
	keywords = {relate:quality, software quality selected},
	author = {L{\'a}szl{\'o} Vid{\'a}cs and Judit J{\'a}sz and {\'A}rp{\'a}d Besz{\'e}des and Tibor Gyim{\'o}thy}
}
@conference {VBF04,
	title = {{Columbus Schema for C/C++ Preprocessing}},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2004)},
	year = {2004},
	month = {mar},
	pages = {75-84},
	publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
	organization = {IEEE Computer Society},
	author = {L{\'a}szl{\'o} Vid{\'a}cs and {\'A}rp{\'a}d Besz{\'e}des and Rudolf Ferenc}
}
@conference {BFG04,
	title = {{CSiBE Benchmark: One Year Perspective and Plans}},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2004 GCC Developers{\textquoteright} Summit},
	year = {2004},
	month = {jun},
	pages = {7-15},
	author = {{\'A}rp{\'a}d Besz{\'e}des and Rudolf Ferenc and Tam{\'a}s Gergely and Tibor Gyim{\'o}thy and G. L{\'o}ki and L{\'a}szl{\'o} Vid{\'a}cs}
}
